Legal Opinion

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Fireguard Corp.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 3, 1995No. Record 940444PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stephenson

The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in ruling, as a matter of law, that a plaintiff was not a third-party beneficiary of a contract.

I

Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (Aetna) and Quincy Station Apartments Limited Partnership (Quincy) filed a motion for judgment against The Fireguard Corporation (Fireguard). Aetna, as a subrogee of its insureds, and Quincy, as an owner, alleged that Fireguard had agreed to indemnify Quincy in a certain contract between Fireguard and Cranshaw Construction, Inc. (Cranshaw).

Fireguard filed a “motion to dismiss” the motion for judgment.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Berry v. KlingerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
  2. Commercial Business Systems, Inc. v. BellSouth Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1995
  3. Valley Landscape Co. v. RollandSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  4. Ward v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of Virginia · 1993
  5. Professional Realty Corp. v. BenderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Eure v. Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2002
  2. TRAVCO Insurance v. WardDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
  3. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. Block Roofing Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
  4. Cohen v. Un-Ltd. Holdings, Inc. (In Re Nelco, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
  5. Kelley v. GriffinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API