City of Chicago v. Gregsten
Appellate Court of Illinois
Memorandum.—In equity. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Murray F. Tuley, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1894, and affirmed-. Statement of the Case.
Read the full summary
Memorandum.—In equity. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Murray F. Tuley, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1894, and affirmed-. Statement of the Case. September 29, 1890, the appellees, Samuel Gregsten and Andrew Cummings, filed a bill of complaint in this cause, praying that the city of Chicago and the commissioner of public works be restrained from ejecting them from the vault or space underneath the alley in the rear of the premises occupied by said appellees, fronting on Dearborn street, Chicago, Cook county, Illinois. This bill of complaint…
1Opinion of the Court
Mb. Presiding Justice Waterman
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The only question presented by the record of this case is whether appellant was entitled to file a supplemental answer, and whether the court was justified in, after refusing to give such leave, entering a final decree in accordance with the opinion of the Supreme Court.
The parties having stipulated that the ,cause should be heard upon the pleadings and the affidavits of Samuel Gregsten, and the cause having been heard upon the pleadings, the order of the Supreme Court is, in connection with its opinion, a direction to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Newberry v. BlatchfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- Wadhams v. GayIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
- Hollowbush v. McConnelIllinois Supreme Court · 1850
- Hook v. RichesonIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
- Gage v. BaileyIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.