Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Samuel Marquez v. Jo Gentry

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 17, 2018No. 16-15634Unpublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGraber, Circuit Judge

I concur in part and dissent in part. I agree with the majority that the district court did not err in denying Petitioner’s ineffective assistance of .counsel claim, but I part ways with the majority with respect to the jury instruction issue.

Every criminal defendant has the right to a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense. California v. Trombetta, 467 U.S. 479, 485, 104 S.Ct. 2528, 81 L.Ed.2d 413 (1984). As we explained in Bradley v. Duncan, 315 F.3d 1091, 1099 (9th Cir. 2002), that right “would be empty if it did not entail the further right to an instruction that allowed the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Marshall v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Stacey Barker v. Joan Yukins, in Her Official Capacity as Warden of the Scott Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  4. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API