Legal Opinion

Earhart v. Hicks

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided February 1, 1983PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAUGHTREY, Judge.

The petitioners in this habeas corpus action successfully contested the state’s authority to hold them in custody for extradition to the State of Mississippi, where they had been indicted for conspiracy to violate Mississippi’s controlled substances act. The state appeals the trial court’s order granting the writ and ordering the petitioners’ discharge. We conclude that the result reached by the trial judge was correct, and we therefore affirm the judgment.

The issue in this case is whether the extradition papers were legally sufficient to permit rendition on the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hyatt v. People Ex Rel. CorkranSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Innes v. TobinSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Compton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. In Re CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rollins v. Winn DixieCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
  2. Kennon v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  3. State v. WallaceNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Edward Rabie v. Hank Hillin, SheriffCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  5. Robert Spooner v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API