Legal Opinion

McKinzie v. Nevada Livestock Production Credit Ass'n

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1991No. 21873Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The underlying claim in this case involves a promissory note. Respondent, Nevada Livestock Production Credit Association *937(Nevada Livestock), sued appellant, Janet McKinzie (McKinzie), and others seeking a deficiency judgment. Nevada Livestock also alleged fraud and sought punitive damages. Eventually, a very short trial was held. McKinzie did not appear and was not represented at the trial. In December of 1990, a previously vacated default judgment was reinstated against McKinzie, awarding Nevada Livestock compensatory damages of more than $700,000.00 and punitive damages of…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stickelman v. MoroniNevada Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API