Legal Opinion

Quantock v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 1903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Howard Circuit Court. — lion. John A. Hochad

1Opinion of the CourtEllison, J.

This action is for damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of the defendant failing to construct a farm crossing for plaintiff over its railway. There was a demurrer to plaintiff’s petition which was sustained by the trial court, and he refusing to plead further, judgment was entered for defendant.

*470It appears that plaintiff owns a body of land of more than two hundred acres lying in about equal parts on each side of the railroad. The road, was constructed in 1873, and at that time both tracts were owned by one Ward. Defendant constructed a crossing for Ward connecting the two tracts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stumpe v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Smith v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brinker v. BrinkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  2. Quantock v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  3. State ex rel. O'Shea v. Farmers' Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Price v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Colorado RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API