People v. Conzo
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Joseph J aspan, J.
The line which marks the boundary between permissible police action and unwarranted intrusion in violation of Fourth Amendment rights is frequently thin and not readily distinguishable. The need for on-the-spot decisions by law enforcement officials does not afford them the luxury of a contemporaneous in-depth analysis or consultation with counsel. It is reserved to the courts to make a retrospective judgment and to consider the multitude of variables in weighing the interests of society vis-á-vis the inherent rights of a citizen.
Such an issue is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. IngleNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. MarshNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- People v. TroianoNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. County of WestchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- People v. EspositoNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. Ostermeier, New York County Courts1983
- People v. HaszingerNassau County District Court · 1991
- People v. EdsallDix Town Court · 1981
- People v. CopelandNew York District Court · 1986
- People v. Wormuth, New York County Courts1981