Lloyd v. STATE EX REL. WYOMING WORKERS'SAFETY AND COMPENSATION DIVISION
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LEHMAN, Justice.
[¶ 1] This is an appeal from the denial of the worker’s compensation benefits claim made by appellant Ronald “Pete” Lloyd (Lloyd). Lloyd’s claim was denied based on the conclusion that Lloyd was acting outside the scope of his employment when the accident occurred. We reverse.
ISSUES
[¶ 2] Lloyd sets forth the following issues:(1) Whether the Office of Administrative Hearings erred when it failed to apply the Wyoming “nexus” test.(2) Whether the Office of Administrative Hearings erred when it failed to apply the “special mission” doctrine.(3) Whether the Office of Administrative…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Newman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division v. JensenWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division v. GarlWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Collicott v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Vaughan v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Berg v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Shelest v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Quinn v. Securitas Security ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Bilyeu v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- Barlow v. State, ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.