Barbour v. Mitchell

The question presented by the present appeal'is, whether the appellee, Henry S. Mitchell, a devisee and legatee under the will of Robert D. Sewall, Esq., late of Prince Q-eorge’s County, deceased, should be enjoined from prosecuting as an heir at law of said Sewall, his bill in equity for the partition of certain lauds devised by William P. Brinham to said Sewall, and of which the latter is alleged *158to have died intestate, and also from prosecuting as next of kin of said Sewall, a suit at law against the appellants, on the administration bond of Brinham’s executor, for the recovery of a…