Legal Opinion

De Acosta v. De Acosta

California Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1933No. Docket No. L.A. 13979PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

In this action in partition, the court rendered an interlocutory decree to the effect that plaintiff and defendant each owned an individual one-half interest in certain real property; that the interveners had a lien of $450 thereon; that plaintiff had a lien for taxes paid by her as well as for half of certain rentals collected by defendant ; that the properly should be sold under direction of a referee and the proceeds of sale applied under final direction of the court.

Plaintiff and defendant were husband and wife. They were separated but plaintiff had by a prior proceeding been denied a…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Presbrey v. PresbreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  2. County First National Bank v. O'NeillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Watson v. BorcovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API