De Acosta v. De Acosta
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
In this action in partition, the court rendered an interlocutory decree to the effect that plaintiff and defendant each owned an individual one-half interest in certain real property; that the interveners had a lien of $450 thereon; that plaintiff had a lien for taxes paid by her as well as for half of certain rentals collected by defendant ; that the properly should be sold under direction of a referee and the proceeds of sale applied under final direction of the court.
Plaintiff and defendant were husband and wife. They were separated but plaintiff had by a prior proceeding been denied a…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Presbrey v. PresbreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
- County First National Bank v. O'NeillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Watson v. BorcovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939