Legal Opinion

Way v. Hygienic Fleeced Underwear Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 1906No. 49Published

In Equity. Suit for infringement of patent. On demurrer to amended bill.

1Opinion of the Court

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

Notwithstanding the able and earnest argument on behalf of the defendants, I am not prepared to say that the validity of the second claim of the Way patent should be determined upon this demurrer, but in so declaring I am not to be understood as intimating any opinion concerning the goodness of that claim. It is admitted to be narrow, and there may be difficulty in saving it after the disclaimer of claims 1 and 3, which was made necessary by the decision of Judge Dallas in Way v. McClarin (C. C.) 91 Fed. 663, affirmed by the circuit court of appeals in 96 Fed.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Way v. McClarinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1899
  2. Way v. McClarinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API