Price v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff, Pamela J. Price (“Price”), seeks judicial review, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), of the Commissioner’s determination that she was not entitled to a period of disability, disability insurance benefits, or supplemental security income under the Social Security Act (“the Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i), 423, 1382c. After due consideration of Price’s arguments on appeal, we AFFIRM the district court’s judgment affirming the administrative law judge’s (“ALJ”) decision to deny Price’s application for benefits.
I
In 2003, Price filed applications for disability…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Debra Rogers v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Robert M. Wilson v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- David Bowen v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Clarence WALTERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Gross v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
- Amanda Yvonne Cooper v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026
- Amy S. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2026
- Aracelis Ayala v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025
- Benitez v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.