Legal Opinion

City of Bellingham v. Struthers

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 24, 2001No. 46154-1-IPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

— This court granted discretionary review to consider Erick Struthers’ challenges to his convictions for violation of a no-contact order and harassment. Finding that the charging documents were not deficient and that sufficient evidence supported the convictions, we affirm.

FACTS

On June 17, 1998, Erick Struthers was charged in Bellingham Municipal Court with violation of a no-contact order. The citation identified the offense as “violation of no-contact order” and referenced RCW 10.99.040(4)(a). Struthers was also charged with one count of harassment under RCW 9A.46.020. The charges arose from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. VangerpenWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. PartinWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. PelkeyWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. DallasWashington Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Bellingham v. StruthersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API