Legal Opinion

Mayo v. Head

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 18, 2006No. S06A0549PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEARS, Chief Justice.

William Mayo and Gerald Rose appeal from the trial court’s denial of their petition for mandamus, by which they sought to compel the Cobb County District Attorney, Patrick Head, to prosecute an instance of perjury that they claim was committed during Mayo’s 1992 criminal trial for armed robbery. Appellants claim that Mayo’s conviction was based on perjured testimony, and that if the perjury were prosecuted, he would be entitled to a new trial.

Prosecuting officials, however, are vested with broad discretion in determining whether to prosecute a particular case.1 Mandamus…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. HansonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  2. State v. WootenSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  3. Bush v. ChappellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  4. Scanlon v. State Bar of Ga.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  5. Bartlett v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. William R. Jackson v. Victor WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  2. Roger C. Day v. Terry E. BernardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API