Winchester Construction Co. v. Miller County Board of Education
District Court, M.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
FITZPATRICK, District Judge.
Defendants have moved for summary judgment on the ground that they are not liable to suit in this contract action. Under Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the party moving for summary judgment bears the initial burden of showing that there are no genuine issues of material fact that should be decided at a trial of the case and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Once the movant carines this threshold matter, the burden sifts to the nonmoving party to demonstrate that there is indeed a material issue of fact or law…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bill Clark Herbert Futch Austin Hurst Louis Sliker and William Barrineau v. Coats & Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Toombs County v. O'NEALSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Tennessee v. WhitworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- MacK v. WR Grace & Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1983
- Cook v. Colquitt County Board of EducationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.