Legal Opinion

Snell v. Cottingham

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1874PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of DeAVitt county; the Hon. Thomas F. Tipton, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

Appellees, by a written contract, obligated themselves to build the Lafayette, Bloomington and Mississippi Railroad from the Illinois Central Railroad, at Bloomington, east to the Indiana State line. The work was to be commenced in 10 days after notice, .and to be completed in 130 days thereafter.

Appellants, for whom the road was to be constructed, agreed to furnish engines and cars sufficient for the transport-ation and hauling of material in the performance of the work ; to furnish material sufficient to lay twenty miles of track per month; to furnish a sufficient number of water tanks, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nibbe v. BrauhnIllinois Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Evra Corp. v. Swiss Bank Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  2. Hooks Smelting Co. v. Planters' Compress Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  3. Morrow v. First Nat. Bank of Hot SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  4. Cochran v. People's Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  5. Spangler v. HolthusenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API