Legal Opinion · Dissent

Riley v. Bear Creek Planning Committee

California Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1976No. S.F. 23374Published

1DissentTobriner, J.

I dissent.

I cannot subscribe to the majority’s conclusion that a buyer of a subdivision lot, who takes his deed with actual knowledge of a general plan of mutual restrictions applicable to the entire subdivision and who conducts himself for many years in a manner which demonstrates his belief that such restrictions apply to his property, may thereafter violate all such restrictions with impunity simply because the restrictions were *513inadvertently omitted from his individual deed. Contrary to the majority’s suggestion, we need not decree this inequitable result in order to prevent fraud to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Werner v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Ridley v. HaimanTennessee Supreme Court · 1932

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API