Riley v. Bear Creek Planning Committee
California Supreme Court
1DissentTobriner, J.
I dissent.
I cannot subscribe to the majority’s conclusion that a buyer of a subdivision lot, who takes his deed with actual knowledge of a general plan of mutual restrictions applicable to the entire subdivision and who conducts himself for many years in a manner which demonstrates his belief that such restrictions apply to his property, may thereafter violate all such restrictions with impunity simply because the restrictions were *513inadvertently omitted from his individual deed. Contrary to the majority’s suggestion, we need not decree this inequitable result in order to prevent fraud to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Werner v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Ridley v. HaimanTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.