Heyer v. Kranch
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 56, Oct. T., 1912, by-plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Schuylkill Co., Nov. T., 1910, No. 4, for defendant on case stated in suit of Christina Wilhelmina Heyer v. George Kranch. Case stated in ejectment for real estate in the borough of Mahanoy City. Before Brumm, J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Error assigned was judgment for defendant on case stated.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
It is admitted in this case stated in ejectment, that the defendant is in possession of the western half of the property on East Mahanoy avenue in the borough of Mahanoy City, being the house and property numbered 805 on said avenue, and that this property belonged to Charles Heyer at the time of his decease. By his will, Charles Heyer directed, inter alia, as follows: “All my property, real and personal, at Scranton and Mahanoy City, Pa., is not *636to be sold after my death, but my beloved wife Christina Wilhelmina Heyer, is to have the income of the same until after her death, all…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Beilstein v. BeilsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- France's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1874
- Drusadow v. WildeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
- Curry v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
3Cited by1 opinion
- LaRosa v. McVickerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958