Legal Opinion

Von Holt v. Izumo Taisha Kyo Mission

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1958No. 3047PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*673OPINION OF THE COURT BY

RICE, C. J.

This is a taxpayer’s suit to have a “purported conveyance,” executed in the name of the City and County of Honolulu, a municipal corporation, as grantor, to an eleemosynary corporation, as grantee, set aside, cancelled, and declared null and void and of no effect.

On October 14, 1953, the petitioner-appellant, hereinafter referred to as the appellant, of and for himself and on behalf of all the taxpayers of the City and County of Honolulu, Territory of Hawaii, of which he alleged himself to be one of the class, filed a petition in the circuit court, first…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Radio Station WOW, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Daly v. ShowersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Jack v. HUNT ET UX.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. HendrySupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  5. First National Bank v. Clifton Armory Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Exotics Hawaii-Kona, Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Associated Engineers & Contractors, Inc. v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. PaulineHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. Stan's Contracting, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Von Holt v. Izumo Taisha Kyo MissionHawaii Supreme Court · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API