Legal Opinion

Carr v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 30, 1997No. A97A1216PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge.

Hazel Carr brought this negligence action against Sears, Roebuck & Company to recover damages for injuries she sustained when she tripped over a stack of boxes of merchandise located in front of a customer service island at a Sears store and fell. Without making findings of fact or conclusions of law, the trial court granted Sears’ motion for summary judgment. Carr appeals.

In reviewing the trial court’s ruling, we construe the evidence and all inferences and conclusions arising therefrom most favorably to Carr as the party opposing the motion. Carr testified at a deposition…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barentine v. THE KROGER COMPANYSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Sheriff's Best Buy, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Hornbuckle Wholesale Florist of MacOn, Inc. v. CastellawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. McCrary v. Bruno's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. HesterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  2. Weickert v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  3. Linda Fabean v. Bath & Body Works, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2026
  4. Robinson v. Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API