Legal Opinion

Heilig v. Haskins

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 24, 1936No. 4-4189PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcHaney, J.

This suit was instituted September 23, .1931, by J. A. Heilig and'W. A. Brown, trustee, to foreclose a deed of trust given by appéllees to secure their promissory note to said Heilig. Answer was filed admitting the execution of the note and deed of trust, pleading a partial payment and denying any indebtedness for taxes, recording fees and insurance. Certain other defenses were set up.

During the pendency of the action and on March 11, 1934, said J. A. Heilig died intestate. On March 18,1935, this action was revived by order of the court in the name of J. Augustus Heilig, as administrator of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  2. Anglin v. CravensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  3. Keffer v. StuartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  4. Prager v. WoottonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wooley v. Planter's Cotton Oil Mill, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API