Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Southern Railway Co. v. Tompkins

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 25, 1896PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Application of the Southern Railway Company, within the original jurisdiction of the Court, for a mandamus requiring Hon. D. H. Tompkins, as secretary of state, to file their charter in his office. Mandamus granted.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Judge Witherspoon,

acting in place of Justice Gary, disqualified. The petitioner, the Southern Railway Company, applies to this Court, in the exercise of its original jurisdiction, for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent, Hon. D. H. Tompkins, as secretary of state, to file in his office a copy of the charter granted to the petitioner under the laws of the State of Virginia, in compliance with the provisions of an act of the legislature, entitled “An act to provide the manner in which railroad companies, incorporated under the laws of other…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Southern Ry. Co. v. QueryDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1927
  2. Leppard v. Central Carolina Telephone Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  3. Lyles v. McCownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  4. Hollingsworth v. Southern Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1898
  5. Geraty v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API