Legal Opinion

Hinckley v. Horazdowsky

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1890PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook, county; the Hon. John P. Altgeld, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilkin

-delivered the opinion of the Court:

This is an action on the case, by appellee, against appellant, and other defendants not served, to recover for a personal Injury alleged to have been received by him through their negligence.

The declaration is of one count only, and avers that defendants were, on the 4th of July, 1886, the owners of, and •operating, a planing mill in the city of Chicago, wherein they used and employed certain machines for planing wood, and •said plaintiff, then' a minor, of the age, to-wit, twelve years, was then and there employed and engaged by said defendants in and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gartland v. Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Evans v. MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Chicago Anderson Pressed Brick Co. v. ReinneigerIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Chicago Drop Forge & Foundry Co. v. Van DamIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Lynchburg Cotton Mills v. StanleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
  5. National Enameling & Stamping Co. v. BradyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API