Legal Opinion
Shedrick v. Shedrick
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 20, 1993No. 11832PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the denial by the trial court of her request to make an order of modification of alimony retroactive to the date the motion was filed. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are necessary to the disposition of this appeal. The marriage of the parties was dissolved *148by a judgment of the trial court on February 16,1988. At the time of the dissolution, there were two minor children issue of the marriage, one age five and the other age three. Custody of the minor children was granted to the plaintiff. The decree of dissolution further provided in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Winchester Woods Associates v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Darak v. DarakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Verrastro v. SivertsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Sanchione v. SanchioneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Baker v. Baker, No. Fa86-0322610 (Sep. 18, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
- Boyles v. Boyles, No. Fa 97-0157079 S (Oct. 28, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
- Jorgo v. Jorgo, No. Fa 92 0127712 S (Dec. 8, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999
- Kiniry v. Kiniry, No. Fa98 0163981 S (Oct. 29, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
- Mahon v. Moorman, No. Cv 95 0329017 (Feb. 28, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.