Legal Opinion
Ogden v. Allstate Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 24, 1982PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Robert A. Harlem, J.
The plaintiffs move for a preclusion order as well as a direction requiring the defendant, Allstate Insurance Company (hereafter Allstate), to produce an expert witness and other materials for an examination before trial.
This lawsuit emanates from a fire loss sustained by the plaintiffs on April 23, 1980. There is no question that the defendant, Allstate, had issued a contract of fire insurance upon the property. Apparently, coverage is denied on the theory that the plaintiffs or oiie of them engaged in intentional acts which were productive of the loss.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Koump v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Kandel v. TocherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Mold Maintenance Service v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Foremost Insurance v. 3 Grace Avenue, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Carden v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984