Legal Opinion

Smith v. Traxler

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 22, 1955No. 17090PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oxner, Justice.

This action has previously been before us on the question of whether defendant should be permitted to amend his answer by adding the defense of the Statute of Frauds, Code 1952, § 11-101 et seq. Smith v. Traxler, 224 S. C. 290, 78 S. E. (2d) 630. We allowed the amendment and thereafter the case came on for trial at the 1954 term of the Court of Common Pleas for Spartanburg County. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s testimony, the Court granted a motion by defendant for a nonsuit. Plaintiff noted a motion for a new trial which was duly heard and taken under advisement. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New Atlantic Garden, Inc. v. Atlantic Garden Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Sellars v. CollinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  3. Smith v. TraxlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1953
  4. Caro. Aviation, Inc. v. Glens Falls Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1949

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Guaclides v. KruseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  2. Riley v. Campeau Homes (Texas), Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Berry-Iverson Co. of North Dakota, Inc. v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Myers v. LovetinskySupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  5. Navasota Resources, L.P. v. First Source Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API