Legal Opinion

James v. Aquavella, M.D., P.C. v. Viola

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 2011No. 177 SSM 17PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The Appellate Division correctly determined that the proffered writings failed to satisfy the statute of frauds (see General Obligations Law § 5-701 [a] [1]). The writings, taken together, fail to contain all of the essential terms of the alleged agreement. Specifically, the writings make no mention of the alleged incorporation of the written agreement’s noncompete clause into the subsequent oral agreement between the parties.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kelly v. P & G Ventures 1, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. Aquavella v. ViolaNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Viking Capital Partners, LLC v. Enterprise Bay Ridge, LLCNew York Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API