Legal Opinion

Ballard v. North Carolina Department of Trans.

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Decided June 15, 1998No. I.C. No. TA-13999Published

1Opinion of the Court

Upon review of all of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good ground to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission MODIFIES and AFFIRMS the Decision and Order of the deputy commissioner as follows:

RULING ON MOTION

Plaintiffs' motion to redact portions of defendant's brief addressing the issue of the statute of limitations is DENIED. Defendant timely raised the statute of limitations issue in its answer and the court may consider jurisdictional issues at any time in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pembee Mfg. Corp. v. Cape Fear Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Whittaker General Medical Corp. v. DanielSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Watson v. North Carolina Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Whittaker Gen. Medical Corp. v. DanielCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API