Legal Opinion

Miller v. Christensen (In Re Christensen)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah

Decided March 31, 2009No. 19-21201PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

THURMAN, Chief Judge.

The matter before the Court is Barret Lloyd and Kaye Gammon Christensen’s (the “Debtors” or “Christensens”), motion to dismiss this adversary proceeding. The Trustee, David L. Miller (“Trustee”), filed the adversary proceeding on September 22, 2008, seeking revocation of the Debtors’ discharge pursuant to § 727(d)(2). 1

The Court is asked to determine whether § 727(e)(2) bars the Trustee’s request to revoke the Debtors’ discharge. The Debtors contend that the request to revoke their discharge is barred by the time limits expressed in § 727(e)(2). The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Mass.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Dwyer v. Peebles (In Re Peebles)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
  5. Caughey v. Succa (In Re Succa)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blackstone Financial Group Business Trust v. Myler (In re Myler)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2012
  2. Dymarkowski (Trustee) v. Sepeda, Jr.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019
  3. Phillips v. Long (In re Long)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API