Legal Opinion

In re the Accounting of Chemical Bank & Trust Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1947Published

1Opinion of the CourtHecht, J.

This is a motion by trustees made pursuant to article 79 of the Civil Practice Act for a judicial settlement of their account. The only question presented is one raised by the guardian ad litem appointed by the court to protect the interests of the infant beneficiaries. He objects to the trustees’ investment in and holding as part of the trust fund, certain municipal and United States Treasury bonds in bearer form" when registered bonds of the same issue are available.

It has been stated by leading authorities on trust law that bonds payable to bearer are a proper investment, and need not be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Union Trust Co. (Hoffman Estate)New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. In re the Final & Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of HalstedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  3. In re the Final Judicial Settlement of the Account of HalsteadNew York Surrogate's Court · 1904
  4. In re the Estate of ErlangerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API