Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Biesman & Carrick Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 4, 1936No. Gen. No. 38,802PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Denis E. Sullivan

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an appeal from a judgment for costs entered ag'ainst the plaintiff in an action in assumpsit in the municipal court of Chicago. In the trial court plaintiff sued for services claimed to have been performed for the defendant. The main controversy between the plaintiff and defendant is that defendant insists the statement of claim recites an action based on an express contract. The plaintiff contends that his claim is for an express contract, or at least one for services performed and the reasonable value thereof.

P…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Board of Highway Commissioners v. City of BloomingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Sussdorff v. . SchmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Mowatt v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Shirk v. BrookfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Neville v. DavinroyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. Moreen v. Estate of CarlsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Nardi & Co., Inc. v. AllabastroAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  5. Aaron v. DauschAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API