Goode v. Meyn
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLevine, J.
In addition to reversing and remitting as to defendants Richard Osterhoudt and Rhinebeck Central School District, we would also reverse and grant a new trial as to defendant Maureen A. Meyn. In charging the emergency doctrine with respect to Meyn’s operation of the vehicle that struck plaintiff Christopher G. Goode (hereinafter plaintiff), Supreme Court failed to differentiate between her conduct before and after she first saw plaintiff and the deer on the highway in front of her. Although we would agree with the majority that Meyn may *440have been faced with an emergency once she finally saw…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hardy v. SicuranzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- McCarthy v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Avila v. MellenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Kowchefski v. UrbanowiczAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Carroll v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.