Legal Opinion

Castillo v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided March 16, 1994No. 05-92-01747-CRPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Justice.

The grand jury indicted appellant for unlawful possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. A jury found appellant guilty and the jury assessed a twelve year sentence. Appellant contends the trial court erred by granting the State’s challenge for cause against a prospective juror. Appellant contends the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction. These contentions are without merit. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

THE DRUG BUST

Two police officers went to a vacant apartment to investigate a report of people selling drugs out of it. No one was in the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. McGoldrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Hai Hai Vuong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Castillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  2. Deener v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
  3. Stubblefield v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
  4. Gant v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2003
  5. Decker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API