Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided March 16, 2005No. 09-03-579 CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOLLIS HORTON, Justice.

Appellant Robert Earl Williams, Jr. was indicted for the offense of aggravated sexual assault, enhanced by prior felony convictions. See Tex. Pen.Code Ann. § 22.021 (Vernon Supp.2005). A jury found Williams guilty. The trial court sentenced Williams to fifty-five years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division. Williams asserts the trial court committed reversible error in overruling his objection to the admission of an extraneous offense of robbery and in failing to grant a mistrial after the introduction of the extraneous…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Wyatt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Simpson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  4. Prible v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  5. Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fischer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2007
  2. Lamar Sanders v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
  3. Lamar Sanders v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
  4. Lamar Sanders v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
  5. Williams, Ex Parte Robert Earl Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API