Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Perez v. Oakland County

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 18, 2006No. 05-1583Published

1ConcurrenceGriffin, Circuit Judge

I concur in the result and join in all portions of the lead opinion except Section II.A.1. Specifically, I join in affirming summary judgment for Oakland County for the reasons stated by Judge Cudahy. I also join in affirming summary judgment for prison caseworker Roberta Rice on the basis of qualified immunity because it would not have been “clear to a reasonable [person in her position] that [her] conduct was unlawful in the situation [she] confronted.” See Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194, 202, 121 S.Ct. 2151, 150 L.Ed.2d 272 (2001); see also Baranski v. 15 Unknown Agents of the BATF, 452…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Edward E. Westlake v. William Lucas, Sheriff of Wayne CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  3. Carolyn Comstock v. Norris McCrary v. S. Thyagarajan and David HowellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  4. Estate of Tori Carter Brenda Chambers v. City of Detroit, Donald Hollins, LieutenantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  5. Randy James Barber, Administrator of the Estate of Kenneth Robert Barber, Deceased v. City of Salem, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API