Legal Opinion

State v. Schoonover

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1922No. 17532PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

— D. N. Schoonover and Owen Baker were convicted of the crime of grand larceny, under an information charging them with taking from one Peter Marinoff, and converting to their own use, one hundred and sixty-five bottles of intoxicating liquor and one hundred dollars in money, the property of Marinoff. From the judgment of conviction, Schoonover appeals.

The information charged, and the evidence tended to show, that the property was taken by trick and device. It appears that, early in the evening on which the offense was committed, Baker met one Cunningham at a railway depot in the city of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  2. State v. DonovanWashington Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ray v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  2. State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People v. KilpatrickSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  4. State v. BeamanWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Bryant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API