Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Broadfoot v. Aaron Rents, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 14, 1990No. A89A2267, A89A2268, A89A2269Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCarley, Chief Judge

In Case No. A89A2267, I concur in the majority’s affirmance of the grant of a directed verdict in favor of appellee-defendants Abco, Breman, Richards and Huggins. It is my opinion, however, that the majority incorrectly dismisses that main appeal as against appelleedefendants Aaron Rents, Inc. (Aaron) and Citizens & Southern National Bank (C & S) and that the majority consequently errs by dismissing Case Nos. A89A2268 and A89A2269 as mooted cross-appeals. I must, therefore, respectfully dissent to the majority’s failure to address the merits of all the issues that, in my opinion, have been…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hambrick v. Fidelity Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API