Legal Opinion

FASTENAL COMPANY v. Crawford

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided February 26, 2009No. 6:09-misc-00006PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

AMUL R. THAPAR, District Judge.

A jury returned a verdict in this matter on September 19, 2008, in Plaintiff Fastenal’s favor. See R. 158. Defendants subsequently filed post-trial motions, which are now pending before the Court. The Defendants are divided into two groups: (1) Stewart Ashton, Jr. and New River Energy Resources, LLC (the “New River Defendants”), and (2) Greg Crawford, Todd Robinson, Eric Miller, and Tri-State Industrial Supply, Inc.(the “Tri-State Defendants”). In separate motions, both the New River Defendants and the Tri-State Defendants seek…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  5. TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Insight Kentucky Partners II, L.P. v. Preferred Automotive Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2016
  2. Monette Saccameno v. U.S. Bank National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  3. Griffin v. JonesDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2016
  4. Watts v. Lyon County Ambulance ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2014
  5. Alph C. Kaufman, Inc. v. Cornerstone Indus. Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2017

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API