Legal Opinion

Constance v. Gosnell

District Court, W.D. South Carolina

Decided September 13, 1945No. Civil Action 574PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WYCHE, District Judge.

This is an action to recover unpaid minimum wages, overtime, liquidated damages and attorneys’ fees under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-219, for work performed for the defendant by the plaintiff, and his two minor sons, Fred and Columbus1 Constance.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff’s two minor sons live with him, that they have not been emancipated, and that the plaintiff, as their father, is entitled to any amount recovered under the Act for services rendered the defendant by them.

At a pre-trial conference the following question was presented…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Northwestern Yeast Co. v. BroutinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  3. State v. LancasterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  4. State v. ScurrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Davis v. Rockton & Rion R. R.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API