Legal Opinion

In re Hartman

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided October 2, 1899PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Bankruptcy. On bankrupt’s application for discharge, and referee’s record of proceedings thereon.

1Opinion of the Court

SUTRAS, District Judge.

The record shows that Hartman owes debts as an individual, as well as a member of the firm of McOlintock & Ilartman. The amended petition shows that Hartman is seeking a discharge from both firm and individual debts. The proper mode of procedure iu this class of cases is set forth in opinion filed in Laughlin’s Case, 96 Fed. 589, which see. The notices to creditors do not inform them that Hartman is seeking a discharge from firm debts, *594nor are there attached to the petition schedules of the firm property. Record is returned to referee, with instructions to call…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re LaughlinDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re MorrisonDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API