Legal Opinion
Matter of Rudey v. Landmarks Pres. Comm'n of the City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 22, 1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs. It was arbitrary and capricious in the circumstances presented for the Landmarks Preservation Commission to differentiate between two residents in the same building in setting the timetable for replacement of nonconforming windows in both units.
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Levine. Taking no part: Judge Smith.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Delaware County Department of Social Services v. PontoneroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Michael R. Gianatasio, PE, P.C. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2016
- Rudey v. Brown, Harris, Steven, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Michael R. Gianatasio, PE, P.C. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2016
- Robles v. New York City Department of Citywide Administrative ServicesNew York Supreme Court · 2014