Legal Opinion
Connie Dietrich v. the Boeing Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 1, 2021No. 19-56409PublishedCited by 231 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CONNIE DIETRICH, an individual, No. 19-56409 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:19-cv-04291- JAK-PJW THE BOEING COMPANY, improperly denominated as The Boeing Company, individually and as OPINION successor by merger to McDonnell Douglas Corporation, successor by merger with Douglas Aircraft Company, Defendant-Appellant, and AUTOZONE WEST, INC., AKA Autozone, Inc., individually and as successor in interest to Chief Auto Parts, Inc.; BORGWARNER MORSE TEC LLC, as successor by merger to Borg-Warner Corporation; HONEYWELL…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Robert H. Harris v. Bankers Life and Casualty Company Kenneth L. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Durham v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Amy Roth v. Cha Hollywood Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Bosky v. Kroger Texas, LPCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by231 opinions
- Raizel Blumberger v. Ian TilleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Sam Friedenberg v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- State of New Hampshire v. P 3M Company, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2022
- (PC) Adams v. DahlDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (PS) Stapleton v. United Healthcare Benefits Plan of CADistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
226 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.