Legal Opinion

State v. Robinson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 16, 1977No. 38106PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals his felony conviction for transporting a female through the State for the purpose of prostitution — a § 563.070 RSMo 1969 violation.

Defendant’s brief is flagrantly deficient and preserves nothing for review. The statement of facts is only a verbatim reproduction of some of the questions and answers of one of the witnesses. It does not comport with the Rule 84.04(c) requirement that the brief contain “a fair and concise statement of facts.” This failure warrants dismissal of the appeal. State v. Schulten, 529 S.W.2d 432 (Mo.App.1975).

Defendant’s brief has raised five points…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. State v. MeiersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  3. State v. McQuinnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  4. State v. GordonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. State v. SkibiskiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. HansonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Ernest Robinson v. Donald W. WyrickCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  3. Mitchell v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. CharityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. State v. ChristianMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API