Legal Opinion

Magers v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 18, 1941PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action, in two counts, upon two insurance policies. Plaintiff had verdicts on both counts. Judgment was entered for the total sum of $21,253, from which defendant has appealed.

[1] Plaintiff has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. He claims that defendant's statement violates our Rule 15; that its assignments of error are broader than the grounds stated in its motion for new trial; and that its points and authorities are abstract statements of law insufficient to present anything for review. Upon careful consideration, we find defendant's statement to be sufficient. While…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Homan v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. Westerman v. Supreme Lodge Knights of PythiasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  3. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  4. Clay v. OwenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  5. State ex rel. Supreme Lodge Knights v. VandiverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Leggett v. Missouri State Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  2. Doty v. American National Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  3. Turner v. BrowneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  4. Bramble v. Kansas City Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  5. Doty v. American National InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API