National Westminster Bank U.S.A. v. Cheng
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
Respondents move for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rules of Civ il Procedure 9(b), 12(c), 12(h)(3), and for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. For the following reasons, respondents’ motion to dismiss the instant action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is granted.
I. BACKGROUND
Petitioner, National Westminster Bank USA (“NatWest USA” or the “Bank”), has brought the instant action against respondents Calvin W.S. Cheng, et ah, to recover judgments entered against Soto Grande Shipping Corporation, S.A.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. TashireSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Manway Construction Company, Inc. v. Housing Authority of the City of Hartford, Hartford National Bank & Trust Co., Garnishee-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Riggs v. Johnson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Earl Berry v. Jimmy McLemore Town of Maben, Mississippi and New Hampshire Insurance Co., Garnishee-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- HBE Leasing, Corp. v. FrankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Williams v. PfefferDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Johnson v. LovatoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2021
- Major League Baseball Properties, Inc. -against- Corporacion de Television y Microonda Rafa, S.A., et al.District Court, S.D. New York · 2025