Legal Opinion

Aikoe v. Hayselden

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1884PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

Decision of

Judd, C.J.

This is a petition for a mandamus to compel the issuing of a Certificate of Appeal to the Court of Tax Appeal of Honolulu.

*535On the part of the petitioner it is shown that she, by her attorney, G. W. Pilipo, placed, on the 31st July, 1884, in respondent’s hands a list of her property with valuation, oh a blank furnished by respondent. The blank was not signed, but Mr. Pilipo says he was ready to sign it when sworn to its correctness by the assessor, and which he expected him to do; but the assessor took and accepted the return without requiring him to sign or swear to it.…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ewa Plantation Co. v. HoltHawaii Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API