Legal Opinion

People v. Frank

California Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1985No. Docket Nos. Crim. 21353, 22347PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

38 Cal.3d 711 (1985)

700 P.2d 415

214 Cal. Rptr. 801

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

THEODORE FRANCIS FRANK, Defendant and Appellant. In re THEODORE FRANCIS FRANK on Habeas Corpus.

Docket Nos. Crim. 21353, 22347.

Supreme Court of California.

June 6, 1985.

COUNSEL

Quin Denvir and Frank O. Bell, Jr., State Public Defenders, under appointment by the Supreme Court, Donald L.A. Kerson and Cheryl Lutz, Deputy State Public Defenders, for Defendant and Appellant and Petitioner.

George Deukmejian and John K. Van de Kamp, Attorneys General, Robert H. Philibosian, Steve White, Chief Assistant Attorneys…

2Cases cited116 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Francis Hernandez v. Kevin ChappellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API