Legal Opinion

Grove v. Cornell University

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 2011No. 239 SSM 33PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The judgment appealed from and the order of the Appellate Division brought up for review should be modified, without costs, by denying defendants’ motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of plaintiffs Labor Law § 240 (1) claim and, as so modified, affirmed.

Triable issues of fact exist as to whether defendants failed to provide an adequate safety device to plaintiff in violation of Labor Law § 240 (1) or whether plaintiffs conduct was the sole proximate cause of his injuries.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Aquavella v. ViolaNew York Court of Appeals · 2011

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grove v. Cornell UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. DECARLO, JUSTINE v. CLYDE BERGEMANN US, INC.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. De Carlo v. Clyde Bergemann US, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. KUNTZ, SR., DAVID E. v. WNYG HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CO.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. Kuntz v. WNYG Housing Development Fund Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API