Legal Opinion

Unangst v. Roe

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1919PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action for an accounting.

1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.

On September 12, 1911, the firm of Van Schaiek & Co., stock brokers, were compelled to make a general assignment. The defendant Roe had left with that firm a large amount of corporate securities and these securities Avere pledged, together with securities belonging to customers of the firm, with various banking institutions as collateral for loans. After the assignment by Van Schaiek & Co. these banking institutions resorted to the pledged collateral to obtain payment of their loans. The defendant Roe claimed that he had a position superior to the OAvners of other securities pledged with his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Whitlock v. Seaboard National BankNew York Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States Trust Co. v. GilchristAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  2. Weinroth v. SwidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API