Legal Opinion

Rice v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 4, 1937No. 8076PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

Appellant brought this suit to recover compensation for total disability under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law of Texas, articles 8306-8309, Rev. Stat.Texas, 1925, as amended (Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St.Tex. arts. 8306-8309). At the close of plaintiff’s evidence defendant moved for a directed verdict on the grounds: That plaintiff had not filed his claim with the Industrial Accident Board within six months after injury nor has shown good cause for delay; and- that the evidence failed to show that he had been permanently injured by the accident. The motion was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holloway v. Texas Indemnity Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  2. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mayers v. Associated Indemnity Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  2. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. McManusCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
  3. Royal Indemnity Co. v. EarlesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API